Maybe working on web stuff is still too culture dependent or even just young space to have enough of old people as changing industries is always hard when you are well in your career.
Skill set is key. What you don't want to be is the old guy with the same skill set as people who are expecting to make half what you expect to make.
My age, coupled with with the fact that I prefer machines over people doesn't endear me to this newer generation of techs. I have been asked at my last several jobs why I don't use Facebook, LinkedIn, or any other social media.
I'm a greybeard and I like it that way. I'll gladly ride out the terminal windows job and light programming until they show me the door. Meetings and budgets are for others...
You are isolating yourself as well though. One study I read is that biases appear in full force after two stereotypes are validated.
Maybe make a linkedin, since that has nothing to do with your age, just so you have an answer that doesn't alienate you, and people might ignore your age for longer.
Then I tell people that I did use them years ago, until I learned about the problem where I was the product being sold, and that anyone who still uses those services is just voluntarily making themselves one of the herd of cattle to be bought, sold, culled, or whatever.
That usually shuts them up.
Angular 1 and 2?
If you're going for the unsackable by dint of arcane knowledge in the long lost technology from another age you want to be right in the guts of things. Something close to the core where everyone is worried that one mistake will cause problems that'll ripple out in all directions.
Just like those kernel hackers mentioned above, or the people writing business operation code in Cobol on a main-frame.
With stock grants? Maybe that's taxable. But uh, wow. It's not "well beyond 6 figures."
As an aside, my optometrist told me that the company with the best vision coverage that she was aware of was not any of the big four, but Oracle.
I guess the best advice for staying relevant is to find a niche that still has some future where you're an expert in your field. And get lucky, very lucky. There are a bunch of us in our late 40s / early 50s that were heavy BSD/Linux kernel contributors who are still relevant, even though we code in C like its 1995. I think this is similar to some folks from an older generation who wrote the COBOL that a lot of enterprises still run on.
BTW: Isn't the cutoff for greygler was 50? I seem to remember being too young to join when I was in my mid 40s.