News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Technical and non-technical tips for rocking your coding ... by ptero on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @09:21AM (#15347513)
I think you nailed the disconnect between our views.

What I personally am looking for is an engineer -- someone who can look at problems formulated in a fuzzy fashion (this is critical), figure out what technical solutions exist, probing the customer/user to flesh out the initially vague requirements and come up with a few different ways to implement this.

You are looking for coders: someone who can take well posed, unambiguous problem and algorithm descriptions and turn those into a working code. That is probably a better fit for a "coding interview" referred to in the title. It is just my experience that I get much better code and value for $ by hiring engineers even though I have to pay them higher salaries. That's just me though, YMMV.

Re:Technical and non-technical tips for rocking your coding ... by kafkaesq on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @12:27PM (#15349418)
You are looking for coders:

No I'm not - I'm very much looking for engineers in the mindset you describe. I just don't think your Lego robot question is a good tool for sniffing out that mindset. (For the simple reason that "muddled interview question" != "fuzzy real-world problem" - in fact there's a world of difference between the two).

But then again, we have a disconnect. Which is of course totally fine.