News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Equifax C.E.O. Richard Smith Retires After Huge Data Breach by g051051 on Tuesday September 26, 2017 @02:15PM (#15341222)
> allow unauthorized people to make spurious changes via their systems and security practices?

I don't follow. Who's the unauthorized party that's "allowed" to make spurious changes via their systems and security practices?

Re:Equifax C.E.O. Richard Smith Retires After Huge Data Breach by rhizome on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @02:35PM (#15350872)
Those who use the holes in their infrastructure, did you see the story about a database being accessible with default credentials? There is some question of scope for that particular issue, but it bodes duplication in the company's practices elsewhere.
Re:Equifax C.E.O. Richard Smith Retires After Huge Data Breach by g051051 on Thursday September 28, 2017 @09:25PM (#15362086)
You mean the web site that didn't have any non-public data, and was actually not in active use for 3 years? I agree that was sloppy, but the site didn't have the level of security requirements that one of the main sites or their internal network had. Do you put a $100 lock on a $5 bike?

And how was this "allow[ing] unauthorized people to make spurious changes"? No data was changed in the breach.