Re:The Montreal Protocol was a landmark environmental success
by danmaz74 on Tuesday September 26, 2017 @11:05AM
(#15339284)
The phrase isn't clear at all, but immediately afterwards they add:
"By 2070 the world would have been 4.5 degrees F (2.5 degrees Celsius) hotter, a level most experts agree is disastrously high"
So, I assume the actual increase the estimated for a situation without the treaty, in 2017, is somewhere between 0 and 2.5 C.
Perhaps the 25% meant that the increase would have been 25% bigger than the increase we actually had?
Hmm, without the protocol, the average daytime temperature would be (287K)*0.25 = 71.75 K hotter [1]. Phew :) I wonder what the article is trying to say.
[1] Using an average surface temperature of 14 degrees Celcius.