News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f... by drostie on Sunday September 24, 2017 @09:49AM (#15324682)
Yep! The mathematics is pretty simple and recurs in a bunch of other places, from the theory of evolution by natural selection, to the question of why things go viral on the Internet.

The basic idea is that these sorts of objects are routinely seeing spontaneous nuclear decays -- there might be billions per millisecond of these. What's important is that each nuclear decay is an explosion which releases debris that can cause other nearby nuclei to decay as a result. So it becomes important to know: what is the average number N of nuclei which fall apart as a direct result of getting hit by the shrapnel of one decaying nucleus?

Since nothing is terribly exact in physics there are two regimes to consider, N < 1 and N > 1. In that first regime we can roughly calculate that we need to multiply this baseline billions-per-millisecond rate of spontaneous decays by the number

    1 + N + N² + N³ + ... = 1/(1 - N)
The virality analogy is "Given one person shares it, what is the average number N of their friends who share it?" As you can see as this gets closer to N=1 it goes towards infinity.

For N > 1 the same multiplier holds but it cannot be summed infinitely: instead we realize that each term takes a slightly longer time period and thus the growth goes something like e^(k t) for some k, it's an exponential growth towards a majority of the sample reacting.

For fissile materials like plutonium, an easy way to increase N is to just bring two plutonium rods closer together: free debris from explosions in the one now cause new explosions in the other. This is called forming a "critical mass" hence the language about "criticality". Another way is to bring in these "neutron reflectors" that reflect the debris back into the same sample, it's basically the same principle.

Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f... by madengr on Sunday September 24, 2017 @10:18AM (#15324782)
If the critical mass of Pu-239 is 11 kg, can you go below that, say 5 kg, by reflecting the neutrons. I just wondering how much below that 11 kg you can go.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f... by Abekkus on Sunday September 24, 2017 @10:57AM (#15324940)
Is there a static substance that reflects loose neutrons? I thought that the choices for a substance were either to let the neutron pass through, or to absorb the neutron
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f... by dasmoth on Sunday September 24, 2017 @11:06AM (#15324973)
Yes [1]. Beryllium is, I believe, the material of choice (although comes with its own problems, e.g. stupidly toxic dust)

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_reflector

Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f... by userbinator on Sunday September 24, 2017 @01:39PM (#15325653)
If you're already working with plutonium, whose dust is also very, very toxic (in addition to being radioactive), the additional danger of beryllium doesn't seem so great in comparison.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f... by cjsuk on Sunday September 24, 2017 @02:10PM (#15325782)
I routinely handled beryllium for a couple of years as it is present in certain electronic RF power amplifiers. It’s perfectly safe in solid form. If you drill it or smash it, a different matter!

Plutonium, not so much.

Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f... by eloff on Sunday September 24, 2017 @05:19PM (#15326557)
I knew a software engineer who made a lot of money in a startup and bought himself an ultralight bike of titanium and beryllium. They ceased the beryllium parts at the Canadian border and I don't think he ever managed to get them released to him.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f... by madengr on Sunday September 24, 2017 @08:06PM (#15327193)
I think only about 2% of the population is sensitive to beryllium. I was in a beryllium monitoring program (yearly blood tests) at work. A few coworkers are sensitive, one getting really sick.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f... by badmin_ on Sunday September 24, 2017 @03:56PM (#15326218)
Beryllium's also used as a neutron multiplier.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f... by soVeryTired on Sunday September 24, 2017 @12:41PM (#15325410)
I remember reading somewhere that water slows neutrons down enough to allow for a much lower critical mass.

I think it's in mentioned in Richard Feynman's account of his time in Loa Alamos in 'Surely you're joking Mr Feynman'.

Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f... by wereHamster on Sunday September 24, 2017 @03:32PM (#15326117)
Not just any water, only https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_water has that property.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f... by philipkglass on Sunday September 24, 2017 @04:10PM (#15326293)
Heavy water is more effective, but light (ordinary) water moderates neutrons too. That's how light water reactors work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light-water_reactor
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f... by valuearb on Sunday September 24, 2017 @12:26PM (#15325325)
google “demon core” for los alamos beryllium reflector hijinks gone awry.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f... by rzzzt on Sunday September 24, 2017 @01:11PM (#15325532)
Moderators reflect and slow down neutrons so you get a controlled reaction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_moderator
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f... by rleigh on Sunday September 24, 2017 @11:12AM (#15324990)
Beryllium, amongst others.