Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f...
by madengr on Sunday September 24, 2017 @10:18AM
(#15324782)
If the critical mass of Pu-239 is 11 kg, can you go below that, say 5 kg, by reflecting the neutrons. I just wondering how much below that 11 kg you can go.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f...
by Abekkus on Sunday September 24, 2017 @10:57AM
(#15324940)
Is there a static substance that reflects loose neutrons? I thought that the choices for a substance were either to let the neutron pass through, or to absorb the neutron
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f...
by dasmoth on Sunday September 24, 2017 @11:06AM
(#15324973)
Yes [1]. Beryllium is, I believe, the material of choice (although comes with its own problems, e.g. stupidly toxic dust)
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f...
by userbinator on Sunday September 24, 2017 @01:39PM
(#15325653)
If you're already working with plutonium, whose dust is also very, very toxic (in addition to being radioactive), the additional danger of beryllium doesn't seem so great in comparison.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f...
by cjsuk on Sunday September 24, 2017 @02:10PM
(#15325782)
I routinely handled beryllium for a couple of years as it is present in certain electronic RF power amplifiers. It’s perfectly safe in solid form. If you drill it or smash it, a different matter!
Plutonium, not so much.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f...
by eloff on Sunday September 24, 2017 @05:19PM
(#15326557)
I knew a software engineer who made a lot of money in a startup and bought himself an ultralight bike of titanium and beryllium. They ceased the beryllium parts at the Canadian border and I don't think he ever managed to get them released to him.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f...
by madengr on Sunday September 24, 2017 @08:06PM
(#15327193)
I think only about 2% of the population is sensitive to beryllium. I was in a beryllium monitoring program (yearly blood tests) at work. A few coworkers are sensitive, one getting really sick.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f...
by badmin_ on Sunday September 24, 2017 @03:56PM
(#15326218)
Beryllium's also used as a neutron multiplier.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f...
by soVeryTired on Sunday September 24, 2017 @12:41PM
(#15325410)
I remember reading somewhere that water slows neutrons down enough to allow for a much lower critical mass.
I think it's in mentioned in Richard Feynman's account of his time in Loa Alamos in 'Surely you're joking Mr Feynman'.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f...
by wereHamster on Sunday September 24, 2017 @03:32PM
(#15326117)
Not just any water, only https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_water has that property.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f...
by philipkglass on Sunday September 24, 2017 @04:10PM
(#15326293)
Heavy water is more effective, but light (ordinary) water moderates neutrons too. That's how light water reactors work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light-water_reactor
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f...
by valuearb on Sunday September 24, 2017 @12:26PM
(#15325325)
google “demon core” for los alamos beryllium reflector hijinks gone awry.
Re:‘Criticality safety event’ occurred at LANL’s plutonium f...
by rzzzt on Sunday September 24, 2017 @01:11PM
(#15325532)
Moderators reflect and slow down neutrons so you get a controlled reaction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_moderator
The basic idea is that these sorts of objects are routinely seeing spontaneous nuclear decays -- there might be billions per millisecond of these. What's important is that each nuclear decay is an explosion which releases debris that can cause other nearby nuclei to decay as a result. So it becomes important to know: what is the average number N of nuclei which fall apart as a direct result of getting hit by the shrapnel of one decaying nucleus?
Since nothing is terribly exact in physics there are two regimes to consider, N < 1 and N > 1. In that first regime we can roughly calculate that we need to multiply this baseline billions-per-millisecond rate of spontaneous decays by the number
The virality analogy is "Given one person shares it, what is the average number N of their friends who share it?" As you can see as this gets closer to N=1 it goes towards infinity.For N > 1 the same multiplier holds but it cannot be summed infinitely: instead we realize that each term takes a slightly longer time period and thus the growth goes something like e^(k t) for some k, it's an exponential growth towards a majority of the sample reacting.
For fissile materials like plutonium, an easy way to increase N is to just bring two plutonium rods closer together: free debris from explosions in the one now cause new explosions in the other. This is called forming a "critical mass" hence the language about "criticality". Another way is to bring in these "neutron reflectors" that reflect the debris back into the same sample, it's basically the same principle.