Re:Push for Gender Equality in Tech? Some Men Say It’s Gone ...
by meowface on Sunday September 24, 2017 @12:12AM
(#15323260)
I think that's a solid argument, but shouldn't the goal be to hire based on merit, not "hire people like ourselves" or "try to avoid hiring people like ourselves by erring towards hiring people not like ourselves"? I think blinding as much as possible in the interview process is fairer and, in the long run, simpler for everyone involved.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Push for Gender Equality in Tech? Some Men Say It’s Gone ...
by DanBC on Sunday September 24, 2017 @04:12AM
(#15323843)
Yes, the goal is to hire on merit. By only hiring people who look like us we're both hiring people who lack merit purely because they're white men, and failing to hire people who have merit purely because they're not white men.
The "but we want to hire on merit" argument is clearly fucking bullshit if you've ever had any involvement in recruitment and seen how flawed it is.
Re:Push for Gender Equality in Tech? Some Men Say It’s Gone ...
by meowface on Sunday September 24, 2017 @12:44PM
(#15325417)
I never said people who want to hire on merit necessarily achieve their goals, just that we should actually remember the original goal and try to achieve it.
It's much harder for white men to preferentially hire white men if as much of the interview process as possible is blinded.
Re:Push for Gender Equality in Tech? Some Men Say It’s Gone ...
by threatofrain on Sunday September 24, 2017 @03:10AM
(#15323678)
Blinding your hiring process may actually make things more lopsided sometimes; i.e., technical screenings without seeing identity. You may find even less minorities hired.