Re:Relicensing React, Jest, Flow, and Immutable.js
by ec109685 on Sunday September 24, 2017 @06:35PM
(#15326852)
Your interpretation is wrong. RedHat’s promise is revoked if you sue them for any patent infringement:
>Our Promise also does not extend to the actions of a party (including past actions) if at any time the party or its affiliate asserts a patent in proceedings against Red Hat (or its affiliate) or any offering of Red Hat (or its affiliate) (including a cross-claim or counterclaim).
So RedHat can hypothetically use all of your software patents and still sue you for infringement based on their patents if you sue them.
Re:Relicensing React, Jest, Flow, and Immutable.js
by mcbits on Sunday September 24, 2017 @09:33PM
(#15327499)
Yeah, I mentioned that above: "unless you sue them first." That's not a major difference from Facebook's terms.
Re:Relicensing React, Jest, Flow, and Immutable.js
by ec109685 on Friday October 06, 2017 @01:42AM
(#15414667)
The how are Facebook and RedHat different?
Re:Relicensing React, Jest, Flow, and Immutable.js
by mcbits on Saturday October 07, 2017 @06:18PM
(#15426000)
To rephrase again... regarding patents, assuming you don't first sue RedHat or Facebook, then:
RedHat won't sue you over your FOSS project that infringes any of RedHat patents, but your proprietary software is fair game.
Facebook won't sue you for infringement caused by using one of their libraries in your software (FOSS or not), but your independent project (FOSS or not) that infringes any Facebook patent is fair game.
Facebook: You can use our software if we can use your patents.
That's my severely over-simplified interpretation. The most significant difference is that Red Hat's promise extends to FOSS in general, though apparently not proprietary software. Facebook's license applies only to specific Facebook FOSS code, but it can be used in proprietary software.