Re:Facebook Scraps Plan for New Share Class
by ams6110 on Friday September 22, 2017 @09:36PM
(#15317505)
Strangely, 20 years ago very few people thought that their name in the phone book was a privacy concern. A few people got unlisted numbers but that was generally because they were public figures to one degree or another and wanted to avoid nuisance calls.
Re:Facebook Scraps Plan for New Share Class
by lstyls on Saturday September 23, 2017 @02:09AM
(#15318416)
This was a concern for most professionals. If you were a physician, lawyer, dentist, etc you did this because you didn't want patients/clients looking you up at home. My father, who is a physician, did this and refuses to open an FB account for the same reason.
Re:Facebook Scraps Plan for New Share Class
by njarboe on Saturday September 23, 2017 @12:24PM
(#15320395)
In "Steve Jobs: The Lost Interview" (which is great), Jobs mentions that when he was twelve he needed some computer parts and looked up Bill Hewlett in the phone book and called him at home. Hewlett picked up, Jobs got the parts and a job at HP (summer job?). Maybe people used to respect other peoples time more and having a listed number was not a big problem.
Re:Facebook Scraps Plan for New Share Class
by PhantomGremlin on Friday September 22, 2017 @10:06PM
(#15317625)
A few people got unlisted numbers but that was generally because they were public figures to one degree or another
Probably a bigger reason that "few" people got unlisted numbers was because it actually cost extra per month to do that. As Dave Barry is fond of saying: "I am not making this up".
Actually that's kind of like what these social networks still do today isn't it?