News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber London loses licence to operate by vertex-four on Friday September 22, 2017 @02:31PM (#15314559)
Indeed. Perhaps it would be difficult to replicate what Uber did in SF and other US cities without breaking regulations - but in London, their model is perfectly replicable, as evidenced by the fact that they were originally given a license by TfL.
Re:Uber London loses licence to operate by sol_remmy on Friday September 22, 2017 @02:52PM (#15314740)
But here's an even better model: 1. Do a good job 2. Consumers use your service & rely on you 3. Wait for the government to try to shut you down 4. Consumers will back you 5. Government backs down & lets you do what you want
Re:Uber London loses licence to operate by jawbone3 on Saturday September 23, 2017 @06:56AM (#15319180)
Something else that can happen is that citizens side with their elected representatives and start boycotting you in significant numbers.
Re:Uber London loses licence to operate by foldr on Friday September 22, 2017 @04:42PM (#15315612)
There's not going to be much public pressure on TfL to reverse this decision. Most Londoners don't use Uber, and there are plenty of alternatives.
Re:Uber London loses licence to operate by henryaj on Friday September 22, 2017 @05:56PM (#15316217)
391,499 Londoners (and counting) beg to differ: https://www.change.org/p/save-your-uber-in-london-saveyourub...
Re:Uber London loses licence to operate by legacynl on Saturday September 23, 2017 @07:23AM (#15319259)
Who wants to bet this petition has been started by Uber itself? How many of these votes are bought?
Re:Uber London loses licence to operate by foldr on Friday September 22, 2017 @05:58PM (#15316231)
How do you know that everyone who's signed it is a Londoner?