Re:New antibody attacks 99% of HIV strains
by joshstrange on Friday September 22, 2017 @02:09PM
(#15314383)
Not only that I've had friends on Truvada (PrEP) that use condoms less because they know they won't get HIV.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:New antibody attacks 99% of HIV strains
by hashmal on Friday September 22, 2017 @02:44PM
(#15314669)
Why is that a bad thing? I don't know for the US, but in other countries you have mandatory tests (hepatitis, gonorrhea, many others) to do every 3 months in order to get the treatment. This alone makes you more protected than people who only use condoms as protection and think they don't need tests.
Re:New antibody attacks 99% of HIV strains
by joshstrange on Friday September 22, 2017 @03:05PM
(#15314848)
They only check Liver/HIV every 3 months (I have to ask for liver every 3, my doctor was going to do it only every 6). I make my doctor also do a full screening but by default he doesn't.
Re:New antibody attacks 99% of HIV strains
by hashmal on Friday September 22, 2017 @03:42PM
(#15315121)
One could expect better indeed. Undiagnosed STDs can be nasty.
Re:New antibody attacks 99% of HIV strains
by kentosi on Friday September 22, 2017 @05:16PM
(#15315880)
The concept doesn't exist in the States, sadly.
Americans please correct me, but here it's more symptomatic with sexual health: You have a rash/etc, so you go see the doctor. There's no early-detection system where you are reminded to get into a clinic every 2-3 months and get a full test (blood test, swabs, etc) for all the usual suspects: HIV, herpes, chlamydia, etc.
Re:New antibody attacks 99% of HIV strains
by cloistered on Friday September 22, 2017 @06:06PM
(#15316291)
I live in Baltimore, and I'm on PrEP. Everyone I know who takes it, including myself, is required to get tested for STDs every 3 months.