The US far left would maybe, possibly, pass as moderate left in France. Obama would be considered... center right? OK, centrist.
These ideas will not easily translate into a US political context :)
For those curious, his movement, FI, proposes also a rewriting of the constitution, Frexit, withdrawal from TTIP, sustainability as law. It's... interesting. It's a very uniquely French party.
Clinton and trump are on https://www.politicalcompass.org/uselection2016
I find the site reasonably unbiased.
There are a lot of interesting intellectual discussion on the far-left here. A good amount of crackpots and conspiracy theorists too, but historically France has always been a crucible for leftist ideologies. On the other hand, there is a certain anti-technologism, a brand of eco-conservatism that seem to be less common in the US.
I use "far-left" to describe FI concisely but I am of the opinion that this is a misnomer. For me, far-left means communist and means collectivization of the means of productions. Only Force Ouvrière and the NPA propose that in France (and together they make 3%) Mélenchon is a more classic left-wing, just a bit more radical than Hollande but maybe less than Mitterand.
Yes, Obama would be considered centrist or right-wing moderate but French politics, like US politics, did shift right in the last decade. Many people compare Macron to Obama. People like me, who are pretty on the left, consider both to be center or right-center but many media put Macron on the left here.
It is muddied by the fact that he (like Obama actually) was vague enough on his campaign promises to not know who he will side with on issues that oppose employees and employers.
> These ideas will not easily translate into a US political context :)
It would be interesting to try though. Here the speaker talks to someone who does not mind leftist ideas but it would be doable to say the same things using a more libertarian mindset. After all, people like Alex Jones would probably be empowered by these too. If you have a leftist audience, focus on the independence from shareholders, if you have a right-wing audience, focus on the independence from government. If you have a conspiracy alt-right audience, wink implying that you get independence from the jews/reptilians/globalists that control the big media companies.
Semantic-field translation is a very useful exercise that the left must master :-)
But you can't just ignore the law like that like you can in USA, the French taxi drivers started attacking and burning Uber cars.
https://techcrunch.com/2015/06/25/french-anti-uber-protest-t...
Most people also see that Uber violates important labor laws so most people did not take sided there.
The reason why taxi drivers could get away with so many violence is because the owners of the main taxi companies are VERY well connected to the political world.
It is a well-thought proposal by someone who knows the press industry well. It of course has leftist bias but I suspect that while there can be political criticism, it is probably pretty solid.
I don't know how applicable it is in the US though.