News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nuclear War Survival Skills (1987) [pdf] by archontes on Thursday September 21, 2017 @05:38PM (#15307588)
Which has constantly made me wonder why we haven't experimented with it as a means of cooling the average global temperature.
Re:Nuclear War Survival Skills (1987) [pdf] by eric_h on Thursday September 21, 2017 @06:58PM (#15308040)
We need a staging/QA Earth so we can run these kinds of experiments.
Re:Nuclear War Survival Skills (1987) [pdf] by subcosmos on Thursday September 21, 2017 @07:36PM (#15308200)
Selenium isn't the best fissile material :p
Re:Nuclear War Survival Skills (1987) [pdf] by partialapply on Thursday September 21, 2017 @06:46PM (#15307982)
Because it doesn't cool the global temperatures by virtue of being itself. Nuclear winter is caused when massive amounts of debris and other particles (like smoke) are shot up into the air, blocking some of the sunlight, resulting in cooler temperatures. This also has the affect of less crop yields due to reductions in sunlight, less electricity generated from solar panels, and other consequences. So unless we want to voluntarily eat significantly less and use less energy in the name of cooling Earth's temp for 5 years, it's not a very viable alternative.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_winter#Mechanism

Re:Nuclear War Survival Skills (1987) [pdf] by jandrese on Thursday September 21, 2017 @09:14PM (#15308696)
Filling the sky with radioactive particles to combat global warming is an end I hope we never reach.
Re:Nuclear War Survival Skills (1987) [pdf] by ethbro on Thursday September 21, 2017 @10:41PM (#15309063)
Assuming low-radiation devices can be used, if things get dire then it certainly beats the alternatives.