Re:A new kind of map: it’s about time
by alphaalpha101 on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @06:27PM
(#15298910)
I disagree about the London tube map. I think it's brilliant. I barely looked at a real map any of the times I've stayed in London. I know the places I want to go, all the guide books (and locals!) tell you the nearest tube station, I know the nearest tube station to where I am. Why do I need a 'real' map?
Re:A new kind of map: it’s about time
by lovemenot on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @07:24PM
(#15299259)
>> Why do I need a 'real' map?
Canonical answer: Queensway to Bayswater
Tube route: Queensway → Notting Hill Gate change train Notting Hill Gate → Bayswater The journey time between these two London underground stations is approximately 15 minutes
Or just walk. It takes 2 minutes.
Re:A new kind of map: it’s about time
by chrishowlin on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @08:11PM
(#15299516)
Having lived in London for a while now, I find myself preferring the tube lines overlaid on a physical map, so that you can reason better about how to get where you want to go (obviously supplemented heavily by Citymapper and Google maps).
I guess that when your abstraction is at the level of start station and end station, that is where the value of the tube map is.
I love the London tube map, but when I lived there, it was all the more useful to me because I look at other maps so that I could know that certain stations were in easy walking distance from each other or some other place I was going to.