The Struggle with Where the Sidewalks Won't Go

Re:The Struggle with Where the Sidewalks Won't Go by Spivak on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @11:51AM (#15295111)

It doesn't seem that unreasonable -- people don't like to be told what to do and a small town might have more pressing issues than sidewalks which, if we're being honest about typical suburbia, that almost no one uses. I think even the staunchest conservatives would argue that a robust network of sidewalks would be nice to have -- I think the issue is making it mandatory.

I think it's weird to make sidewalks your hill to die on but without context it seems like it could be a reasonable policy decision.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Struggle with Where the Sidewalks Won't Go by Spooky23 on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @02:00PM (#15296546)

It's an inner suburb where the population center is like a lower density urban neighborhood.

IMO, it's a way to fight the in-demand construction for today, which is medium density apartments, and more kids looking for access to the schools.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Struggle with Where the Sidewalks Won't Go by jtuente on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @06:13PM (#15298803)

From another direction, how does "mandatory sidewalks" make medium density apartments more viable in that locale? Is it by putting the onus/cost on the city/taxes to develop the sidewalks, thereby acting as a subsidy for the apartment developer?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Struggle with Where the Sidewalks Won't Go by Spooky23 on Thursday September 21, 2017 @09:14AM (#15302987)

I don't follow this terribly closely, as its not my town. My understanding is that there's an overall focus on walkable infrastructure that is accessible to services and transit on foot. Some folks are unhappy with that.

There's a lot of dynamics at play. People who own property don't like the mandates because they potentially impact the value of the subdivided value (the builder makes the sidewalks, the municipality maintains them), many people don't want more people & school enrollment because that drives taxes, and old people are afraid of people who ride the bus for various reasons.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Struggle with Where the Sidewalks Won't Go by s73ver_ on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @11:53AM (#15295142)

It doesn't seem that unreasonable... until you're in a situation like the people in the story.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Struggle with Where the Sidewalks Won't Go by LanceH on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @03:36PM (#15297445)

And their position isn't unreasonable until you're billed $10k for sidewalk repair.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Struggle with Where the Sidewalks Won't Go by s73ver_ on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @07:47PM (#15299399)

Most of us are arguing that it should be the city's responsibility to take care of the sidewalks, but beyond that, I don't see it any different than maintaining any other part of your house.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Struggle with Where the Sidewalks Won't Go by LanceH on Thursday September 21, 2017 @10:28AM (#15303740)

I was agreeing -- just adding that some people are getting slammed with bills for a mandate that was put in place after they purchased their property.

[ Parent | on HN ]