> "exact same end result" is far from the current situation
My point can be rephrased as "given that the result is the same, do employee counts matter"? If not, then they don't matter in general.
My point can be rephrased as "given that the result is the same, do employee counts matter"? If not, then they don't matter in general.
Not really, but "exact same end result" is far from the current situation. And I'm not saying they shouldn't do it, rather that they really need to catch up.
Google (not counting other Alphabet companies) does a lots of things. I think the original analogy is mostly right.