News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Keccak is not ARX by Confiks on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @05:29AM (#15291950)
Shots fired indeed, although the 132-character argument is a bit of a straw man; the original argument was that using ARX operations in cryptographic primitives makes it harder to analyze the primitive, regardless of whether the actual weakness is in a boolean or an ARX operation.
Re:Why Keccak is not ARX by npscalar on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @10:29AM (#15294107)
Agreed. No contradiction. keccak.team does not say ARX is broken, only harder to analyze (and slow in HW, and getting obsoleted).