Re:Cost of Employer-Provided Health Insurance Rises Toward $...
by didgeoridoo on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @07:36AM
(#15292583)
If you're an officer in an S-Corp, you're required to pay yourself a "market rate" salary for payroll tax purposes, and cannot legally use the salary/draw distinction as a tax avoidance strategy. If you're not paying yourself a salary, the IRS gets very annoyed.
If you're a sole proprietor, the tax impact should be equivalent whether you choose to take draws or salary:
> Sole proprietors and members of partnerships are free to pay themselves — or otherwise take the profits out of their businesses — whenever they’d like. Payroll withholdings do not apply, but each individual essentially pays the equivalent on his or her reported income at tax time.
https://quickbooks.intuit.com/r/payroll/salary-or-draw-how-t...
Re:Cost of Employer-Provided Health Insurance Rises Toward $...
by dangero on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @11:52AM
(#15295129)
Paying the health insurance through payroll would be in addition to the fair and reasonable salary. Say I set a fair and reasonable salary of $65,000, then I want the S-Corp to cover my health insurance $20,000 a year then I need to set payroll to $85,000.
Yes, I could continue to pay myself just $65,000, but the IRS could come knocking and say, "you said you paid for health insurance through S-Corp payroll, so that means you only gave yourself a $45,000 salary which is not fair and reasonable.
In general I think the point is, why can corporations just straight write off premiums for their employees when self-employed types have all these special rules to follow vs just a standard deduction?