Why Keccak is not ARX

Re:Why Keccak is not ARX by snakeanus on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @10:44PM (#15290374)

The old site from the keccak team was nice, light, easy to use (you could easily find the paper or post that you wanted) and cute. The new one can't even be accessed with js disabled. Why that huge step backwards?

And referring to DJB just by his twitter handle, seriously?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Keccak is not ARX by pwg on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @06:09AM (#15292126)

In the case of this site, disabling stylesheets will let you read the article while keeping JS disabled.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Keccak is not ARX by drxzcl on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @05:08AM (#15291858)

I’m guessing the article was edited, because now it says “Daniel J. Bernstein”.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Keccak is not ARX by baby on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @04:39AM (#15291756)

I like the new site. It feels more organized to me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Keccak is not ARX by ghusbands on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @05:11AM (#15291870)

For better or worse, javascript (enabled) is now an expected feature in all browsers, just like HTML and CSS; if you browse with it disabled, you can expect many things to break and don't really have cause for complaint.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Keccak is not ARX by snakeanus on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @11:46AM (#15295047)

> is now an expected feature in all browsers

If you use the tor browser you are actually expected to have it disabled.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Keccak is not ARX by minitech on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @10:02AM (#15293792)

> just like HTML and CSS

And yet if you browse this website with CSS also disabled, you get to enjoy the content without the pointless, distracting, time-consuming, and resource-wasting full-page second loading indicator (the browser already includes one!) and animations.

[ Parent | on HN ]