Re:U.S. Navy to use Xbox 360 controllers to operate periscop...
by kobeya on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @08:01PM
(#15289749)
Case in point, SpaceX has demonstrated that applying standard business optimization tactics to space hardware manufacturing works.
Re:U.S. Navy to use Xbox 360 controllers to operate periscop...
by greglindahl on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @01:58AM
(#15291159)
Mostly. Note that EELV and NASA launches by SpaceX have an extra paperwork charge, which is as big as $20mm. One hopes that eventually the US government will be able to take advantage of the same, cheaper service that commercial launches buy.
I understand the complexity of the issue at hand. I can.
Nevertheless simple handles going for 200K a piece is a vast budget. Any proper business would quickly open up an internal department to "do the handles" since it both allows them to grow for free (you get additional specialists and the handles) and allows to use the same engineers for something else. More importantly testing becomes less of an issue since now you may easily do integrated testing of several disjoined components at once.
So no - I understand where the expenses come from. But it doesn't mean that structure is in _any_ way motivated.
The idea of subcontracting and every little piece of hardware being done by a separate little entity doesn't seem to work both in terms of pricing and in terms of the amount of work it would be doing be it a merged entity.