>Bitcoin's monetary policy is deterministic and consensus-based
So far consensus has been to deflate the hell out of the coin so miners and speculators can make a ton of money. That really seems like an awful currency to me.
So far consensus has been to deflate the hell out of the coin so miners and speculators can make a ton of money. That really seems like an awful currency to me.
My biggest unknown, and the problem I've seen with the idea of a centrally managed cryptocurrency (especially one with convertibility) is the creation/redemption mechanism. The proposals I've seen talk about varying the block reward, or having some sort of transaction type that can only be submitted by the central bank.
I hate to think, though, that the entirety of the security of a nation's money lies in the ability of the central bank to safeguard its private keys. Bitcoin's monetary policy is deterministic and consensus-based, so it's not really vulnerable to this.
It's all well and good to talk about CBCCs in the abstract, but the technical challenges involved are non-trivial and shouldn't be glossed over.