W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns

Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns by slrz on Monday September 18, 2017 @09:45PM (#15281197)

You do get better quality, but only if your system has an OS-level DRM implementation and the browser uses it. This is the case for IE Edge on recent Windows, but not much else.

Chrome on Windows uses its own Widevine DRM implementation instead of the OS-integrated one.

This shitshow is referred to as "robustness requirements" and Netflix apparently agreed to serve high-resolution video only to DRM implementations of certain "robustness" level (OS-integrated DRM with video drivers that co-conspire in enforcing restrictions on the actual device owner).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns by jjeaff on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @03:11AM (#15282401)

All this complexity to protect the content and yet there isn't a movie or TV show out there you can't find in crisp 1080p on Usenet or torrent sites with one quick search.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns by Freak_NL on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @04:00AM (#15282604)

That's the maddening part that's driving me away from Netflix and similar services. I am completely willing to a pay reasonable sum for content, and the current batch of media providers do a tolerable job, but limiting the image quality because my computer is too free is just silly.

I can get the exact same episode or film — in any resolution — on my HTPC in five minutes, DRM free, by breaking the rules.

[ Parent | on HN ]