News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns. Parent comment

Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns by khedoros1 on Monday September 18, 2017 @06:15PM (#15280158)
Flash and Silverlight DRM (as an example of 2) weren't previously web standards, and even the 3rd party plugins that included them had significant non-DRM-related uses.

This is a different animal: Adding standardized interfaces to browsers specifically designed to talk to dedicated DRM modules.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns by epistasis on Monday September 18, 2017 @06:47PM (#15280372)
That's what I'm asking about; where was the pushback on those two bits of DRM? The position advocated by the poster I was responding too would take a very harsh view on Flash and Silverlight, even with their other uses.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns by khedoros1 on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @12:24AM (#15281759)
Right, and from what they posted, I'm sure they took a harsh view of DRM-supporting plugins at the time too. I was trying to answer your questions about why there wasn't historically pushback that matches what we're seeing over EME now.

There were people that complained about Netflix using Silverlight, and such (in my case, it meant I couldn't watch it on my PC, for example). People complained about Flash back in its heyday too.

EME isn't causing a general outcry though, outside of certain corners of the tech world.

[ Parent | on HN ]