Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by leggomylibro on Monday September 18, 2017 @06:34PM
(#15280292)
I already use noscript, but most people won't like having to hit 'temporarily allow' and reloading the page 1-3 times before most sites will function. Also, sites that lean heavily on trendy frameworks like fucking React often just white-screen because of their extreme reliance on JS. I'm hugely against its adoption for that reason, but I understand that I'm in the minority there.
I dunno, it just seems like common sense at this point. Javascript is a powerful attack vector, like ads. And many people already use adblockers in some capacity, for that kind of reason.
It'll definitely suck as HTML5's various peripheral features become strong and widely-used attack vectors.
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by jdmichal on Monday September 18, 2017 @06:49PM
(#15280380)
I mean, if a site legitimately needs a large amount of dynamic communication back to the server... Fine, whitewall me until I enable your JavaScript. I understand that server-side rendering is basically dead. But it's really frustrating when it's things that could be easily served statically, like blogs.
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by dom0 on Monday September 18, 2017 @06:53PM
(#15280398)
> I understand that server-side rendering is basically dead.
Server-side rendering is a mature technology, don't measure it's pervasiveness in how often you see articles in the news about it...
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by jdmichal on Monday September 18, 2017 @07:00PM
(#15280443)
Hey, I love ASP.NET as much as the next guy. But there's no mistaking the large trend from what used to be entirely server-side rendering (LAMP days) to REST services with JavaScript front-ends.
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by theSpaceOctopus on Monday September 18, 2017 @08:11PM
(#15280798)
> But there’s no mistaking the large trend...
You didn’t say that, you said “server side rendering is basically dead”.
Believe it or not, lots of people are still building things without JavaScript front ends.
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by jdmichal on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @11:19AM
(#15285386)
So is the only argument here that "basically dead" was a bit carelessly hyperbolic?
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by chrisweekly on Monday September 18, 2017 @08:20PM
(#15280832)
SSR is table stakes for any reasonably modern web application.
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by jdmichal on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @10:59AM
(#15285221)
No true Scotsman... I would say more, but that's your entire comment so I don't have anywhere else to go.
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by yosito on Monday September 18, 2017 @06:59PM
(#15280434)
Count me in. There will be at least three dozen.
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by jameskegel on Monday September 18, 2017 @08:22PM
(#15280839)
We can always reclaim Gopherspace!
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by mozumder on Monday September 18, 2017 @06:14PM
(#15280152)
getting a little optimistic there...
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by glitcher on Monday September 18, 2017 @06:29PM
(#15280261)
Dozens compared to the many millions who wouldn't make such a switch doesn't feel all that optimistic.
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by shallot_router on Monday September 18, 2017 @06:31PM
(#15280273)
I believe they were being sarcastic.
Me too. There will be dozens of us.