Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by dTal on Monday September 18, 2017 @05:39PM
(#15279869)
What good is Firefox if it doesn't have integrity?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by kibwen on Monday September 18, 2017 @05:47PM
(#15279940)
I can't tell if this is satire. Does anyone seriously believe that surrendering the war when you've lost one battle is an intelligent strategy? Mozilla contributes a whole lot to OSS, including providing a browser that can be trivially used without any black-box DRM-enforcement code hitting your system.
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by dTal on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @12:32PM
(#15286127)
I didn't mean to suggest I categorically disagreed with the decision, in this case. I simply note that you can't extend that logic indefinitely, or you lose the thing you're fighting for.
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by lern_too_spel on Monday September 18, 2017 @06:42PM
(#15280337)
You are free to run Firefox without the DRM module.
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by thatzerodude on Monday September 18, 2017 @06:00PM
(#15280060)
True that. Time to start using Firefox forks.
Pale Moon, Iceweasel, GNU Icecat.
Maybe go even further outside the box, use gngr: https://gngr.info/
Re:W3C abandons consensus, standardizes DRM, EFF resigns
by yellowapple on Monday September 18, 2017 @06:21PM
(#15280203)
Exactly. The whole point of Firefox is to be the browser that actually protects its users. If I wanted DRM shoved down my throat, I'd be using Chrome.