Re:What, exactly, do philosophers do?
by dvt on Monday September 18, 2017 @02:58PM
(#15278520)
Obviously I can't prove it, but we can look at a few metrics: academic performance, influential ideas, impact on society. I think Carmack would lose on all these fronts.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What, exactly, do philosophers do?
by sillysaurus3 on Monday September 18, 2017 @03:01PM
(#15278541)
How have modern philosophers impacted society? (Show your work.)
It seems obvious that Carmack's ideas have been far more influential than most philosophers' ideas, but admittedly this is difficult to measure. Impact on society isn't, though.
“Every mathematician believes that he is ahead of the others. The reason none state this belief in public is because they are intelligent people.”
Gorsuch, for example, often bases his arguments and decisions[1] on the moral framework of Dworkin[1] and Singer[2], just to name two of the biggest modern moral philosophers, regularly. If you don't think that SCOTUS decisions have more and longer-lasting social impact than Doom and the Oculus Rift, then we have some foundational disagreements.
[1] https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/02/trump-b...
Re:What, exactly, do philosophers do?
by eli_gottlieb on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @11:52AM
(#15285711)
>Gorsuch, for example, often bases his arguments and decisions[1] on the moral framework of Dworkin[1] and Singer[2], just to name two of the biggest modern moral philosophers, regularly.
I don't think that changing Dworkin's or Singer's mind on an issue would proceed to strongly affect Gorsuch's views. I think he'd just find another philosopher to cite, because his ultimate views are political rather than moral.