Prime Day 2017: 12.9M DynamoDB requests per second

Re:Prime Day 2017: 12.9M DynamoDB requests per second by pentelian on Monday September 18, 2017 @01:06AM (#15273527)

When I read that I thought holy heck... on DynamoBD, if it's not a case study about Amazon then that company is in serious financial trouble.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Prime Day 2017: 12.9M DynamoDB requests per second by usaphp on Monday September 18, 2017 @02:13AM (#15273715)

I would want to have a "trouble" of having 12.9M customer requests per second ))

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Prime Day 2017: 12.9M DynamoDB requests per second by hobofan on Monday September 18, 2017 @02:10PM (#15278130)

If the AWS cost estimator is not broken, it wouldn't even be _crazy_ expensive at ~8mio/month. Snap with 1 billion committed to AWS over the next 5 years could definitely come close to the same order of magnitude on a consistent basis.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Prime Day 2017: 12.9M DynamoDB requests per second by dx034 on Monday September 18, 2017 @07:27AM (#15274904)

I'm sure that any external client using >1bn queries per day would get a very different pricing from the one advertised.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Prime Day 2017: 12.9M DynamoDB requests per second by jjeaff on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @03:27PM (#15288008)

I have heard that the price is the price for AWS and that the small guys pay the same as the biggest ones. But I have no evidence to back that up.

[ Parent | on HN ]