Re:We've failed: open access is winning and we must change o...
by allenz on Saturday September 16, 2017 @11:53PM
(#15268147)
> piracy as a threat to their revenue streams, hence "competition"
By your logic, I can "compete" with GM by stealing all of their car inventory and blowing up all their factories in Detroit. I don't think that makes sense.
> the market has simply changed
Strongly disagree. What exactly is the new market? Selling journal t-shirts?
> yet the peer review process relies on unpaid volunteers
> Publication bias is a thing
I say that publishers add much more value than pirates. Sure, publishers aren't perfect and others add value too. So what?
By your logic, I can "compete" with GM by stealing all of their car inventory and blowing up all their factories in Detroit. I don't think that makes sense.
> the market has simply changed
Strongly disagree. What exactly is the new market? Selling journal t-shirts?
> yet the peer review process relies on unpaid volunteers
> Publication bias is a thing
I say that publishers add much more value than pirates. Sure, publishers aren't perfect and others add value too. So what?