News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We've failed: open access is winning and we must change o... by Myrmornis on Saturday September 16, 2017 @10:02PM (#15267864)
It's standard in human genetics, at least in the UK. The editors of Nature have a close relationship with influential PIs and their labs, are present at social events / parties, and the general direction and appropriateness/desirability of papers are certainly discussed with the editors early in the process. These are projects with large budgets that span several years. Of course, there is still peer review, and it is still rigorous.
Re:We've failed: open access is winning and we must change o... by kobeya on Sunday September 17, 2017 @03:12AM (#15268591)
I can't speak for the UK, but in the government-managed science programs of other countries this behavior would be landing people in prison, standard practice or not.
Re:We've failed: open access is winning and we must change o... by fsloth on Sunday September 17, 2017 @03:47AM (#15268660)
What makes it illegal? I mean, what specific law would make it so? Where exactly?