News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We've failed: open access is winning and we must change o... by leeoniya on Saturday September 16, 2017 @05:25PM (#15266843)
> Publishers select the reviewers, analyze the reviews, and accept or reject.

all this tells me is that there's a serious lack of adequate tools or some common, open platform to facilitate this. it was hard [expensive] to collaborate on sourcecode before Github; now it isnt. it was difficult to research prior art for patents, now it isnt via patents.stackexchange.

Re:We've failed: open access is winning and we must change o... by allenz on Saturday September 16, 2017 @06:52PM (#15267193)
I agree, editorial committees based on a software workflow could be a real competitor to the current publishers. I'd caution that (1) everything sounds easy from a high level view, when we don't see the complexity, and (2) that the hardest problems are not technical, but social.