News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Software Engineer, Machine Learning by xroche on Friday September 15, 2017 @10:08AM (#15257239)
All modern research/studies tend to demonstrate that, beyond 40 hours, productivity does not rise, and, beyond 50 hours, it actually plunge, with quality dropping, employees driven to burn-out, etc.

But still, the stupid mantra from the Silicon Valley is "you have to work 80 hours to be successful"

Why are these CEO/CTO unable to comprehend studies and adopting a totally irrational position ?

https://www.inc.com/tom-popomaronis/science-says-you-shouldn... https://www.cnbc.com/2015/01/26/working-more-than-50-hours-m... https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/cs181/projects/crunc...

Re:Software Engineer, Machine Learning by edanm on Sunday September 17, 2017 @10:57AM (#15269900)
Probably because most people don't really believe these studies (assuming they've heard of them). I'm very doubtful of them myself.

It really just-so happens that the standard US workweek is the exact perfect amount? That sounds incredibly unlikely. And this is a hard thing to study, too.

Moreover, anecdotally, I know plenty of people that work more hours than this, effectively (and also some that work less!).

Re:Software Engineer, Machine Learning by wageslaving on Friday September 15, 2017 @10:45AM (#15257553)
the name of the game is leveraging explosive, unsustainable growth into a high rate of return into cheap capital into a big payday for founders

everything else is long-term

Re:Software Engineer, Machine Learning by DevinTheDude on Friday September 15, 2017 @02:27PM (#15259469)
> the name of the game is leveraging explosive, unsustainable growth into a high rate of return into cheap capital into a big payday for founders

I've come to the conclusion this is the case. Has anyone written on this?