News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fingerprints are usernames, not passwords (2013) by kibwen on Thursday September 14, 2017 @11:42PM (#15254457)
This is irrelevant, because if you believe that you're at risk from your fingerprint data being compromised, you can always fall back to not using biometrics at all. They aren't your primary authentication mechanism.
Re:Fingerprints are usernames, not passwords (2013) by foo101 on Friday September 15, 2017 @01:49AM (#15254939)
Whether you can fallback to not using biometrics is irrelevant to whether biometrics is equivalent to usernames or passwords. In fact, your point that one can fallback to not using biometrics once it is compromised proves that biometrics is not equivalent to passwords.
Re:Fingerprints are usernames, not passwords (2013) by kibwen on Friday September 15, 2017 @02:00AM (#15254979)
At no point have I argued that biometrics are equivalent to passwords. But to conclude that biometrics must be equivalent to usernames because of that fact would be a false dichotomy. Biometrics serve an auxiliary role in security as an optional, subservient supplement to passwords.
Re:Fingerprints are usernames, not passwords (2013) by unkown-unknowns on Friday September 15, 2017 @05:17AM (#15255732)
If you never use your password do you then expect to remember it?
Re:Fingerprints are usernames, not passwords (2013) by kibwen on Friday September 15, 2017 @11:34AM (#15257966)
Yes. If you read about how biometrics are implemented on handsets, a user is required to enter their password every time that the device is rebooted. The password is also required at random intervals, once every few days or so. And if the biometric scanners log a handful of failed accesses, the handset is locked and a password is again required to enter.
Re:Fingerprints are usernames, not passwords (2013) by yeukhon on Friday September 15, 2017 @12:54AM (#15254740)
The trend is we are going to see more use of biometrics to authenticate.