News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sublime Text 3.0 by bitexploder on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @03:45PM (#15241899)
Sublime took off cause it just works and it has a nice default color scheme and just enough batteries included to make it a functional programming environment for the 80% of programming situations. And it now has enough addons to increase quality of life in many areas and or solve the other 20% in many cases.

If I install emacs it is just okay. It probably has syntax highlighting, depending on the Linux distribution. It probably doesn't have any quality of life improvements for language X. I can drop in a theme and colorize it pretty quickly to my liking. From there, emacs is still very powerful, but there are a lot of things I really love for long and deep editing sessions when I am going through a lot of files on a code review or what not.

Re:Sublime Text 3.0 by nerdponx on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @04:20PM (#15242198)
Don't forget: it can be arbitrarily extended in a popular programming language and it has an unrestricted free trial.
Re:Sublime Text 3.0 by cdelsolar on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @04:55PM (#15242568)
ST or Emacs?
Re:Sublime Text 3.0 by bitexploder on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @05:23PM (#15242827)
ST. Python is the popular language. Elisp is... not popular. But you can do CL in emacs.

As an aside I found the Leo editor not too long ago. http://leoeditor.com/ -- one of the few editors that made me think "that is a little new". Leo is implemented in Python.

I wish there was a modern equivalent of emacs, only all Python. :)

Re:Sublime Text 3.0 by nerdponx on Thursday September 14, 2017 @07:02AM (#15246722)
Yuck. I prefer what Neovim did: editor comminicates using RPCs with arbitrary external programs using over a socket. Zero language lock-in and maximum extensibility.
Re:Sublime Text 3.0 by nerdponx on Thursday September 14, 2017 @03:19PM (#15251576)
Addendum: then again, you could use Python to do that.