Re:Announcing Caddy Commercial Licenses
by Sir_Cmpwn on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @11:27AM
(#15239152)
I think they should have waited more than a few minutes to start hassling the fork about it.
Re:Announcing Caddy Commercial Licenses
by Whitestrake on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @11:34AM
(#15239255)
Yeah, they could have got away with waiting, maybe even a few days for everything to settle before making contact.
But they're here in this thread, paying attention to the discussion, and people have wasted no time in making the fork in the first place.
At the very least, I think the "absolutely devoid of class" comment is uncalled for. I don't think it's unreasonable, not even in terms of time frame, even if I disagree with the manner in which it was done.
Re:Announcing Caddy Commercial Licenses
by lol768 on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @11:58AM
(#15239533)
> Yeah, they could have got away with waiting, maybe even a few days for everything to settle before making contact.
What frustrated me was that I'd already turned on the issue tracker and created an issue to monitor progress on removing links and references to Caddy.
A valid point, and one we both know the answer to - I won't try to argue otherwise.
While I think their statement on the issue page was not handled very well, and I would have tried to avoid the implicit threat... Do you think they should have just left it alone without saying anything once they were made aware of it?