News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Sublime Text 3.0. Parent comment

Re:Sublime Text 3.0 by rootlocus on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @09:52AM (#15238229)
Did you just write 3 paragraphs of Atom review on the sublime 3.0 release announcement?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sublime Text 3.0 by hellofunk on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @10:08AM (#15238372)
So what if he did? Any article and discussion about a code editor is going to inevitably inspire conversation and comparisons with other editors.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sublime Text 3.0 by rootlocus on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @10:31AM (#15238612)
The discussion sparked by it revolves around "don't be cheap" and "try visual studio code". Just like every other discussion about Atom, Sublime or Visual Studio Code.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sublime Text 3.0 by adtac on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @10:15AM (#15238451)
What's wrong with that? Atom aims to compete with Sublime and there's nothing wrong with a review comparing the two.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sublime Text 3.0 by rootlocus on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @10:27AM (#15238582)
Except for the fact that there's barely any comparison, and nothing new is mentioned. Atom is cool, slow and not every language is supported equally. Sublime costs money. Hardly warrants 4 total paragraphs where sublime is barely mentioned.
[ Parent | on HN ]