Re:Washington Post integrates Talk – Mozilla’s open-source c...
by alanbernstein on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @10:43PM
(#15235106)
That seems like an unnecessary nitpick, considering Stack Exchange clearly includes a "comment" feature. Would you care to elaborate?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Washington Post integrates Talk – Mozilla’s open-source c...
by icebraining on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @08:20AM
(#15237549)
I think codinghorror is just annoyed that Discourse wasn't mentioned :)
(Just kidding!)
Re:Washington Post integrates Talk – Mozilla’s open-source c...
by neilsimp1 on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @07:47AM
(#15237322)
It's a Q&A system with commenting on the Q's and A's. Similar, but different, I guess.
Re:Washington Post integrates Talk – Mozilla’s open-source c...
by Spivak on Thursday September 14, 2017 @11:14PM
(#15254308)
Sure, but even the QA is basically a post/comment system adapted to solve a different problem. It's not so weird to take the lessons learned there and apply it back to general comment systems.
- A reputation scheme for both posters and commenters.
- Pinned responses from the poster.
- The comments appear in a 'best' ordering.
- Bad comments get pushed down and hidden.