Daniel Kahneman “I placed too much faith in underpowered studies”

Re:Daniel Kahneman “I placed too much faith in underpowered ... by Zaak on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @07:58PM (#15234179)

To clarify my comment, I wasn't intending to slight the science behind LIGO, nor the scientists working on the project. Rather, I was trying to mean that the main challenge to detecting gravitational waves was "merely" building a detector sensitive enough to detect signals as faint as gravitational waves were predicted to be.

The original post here is talking about reproducible results and p-values and publishing. Is LIGO a particularly good example of that part of science being done well? I don't know either way.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Daniel Kahneman “I placed too much faith in underpowered ... by ZeroGravitas on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @08:48AM (#15237735)

I was under the impression that many advances in science took this form e.g. invent a microscope or telescope and then spend the next few decades pointing it at things and writing down what you find. Make it better, point it at smaller or further away things. And repeat.

[ Parent | on HN ]