News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:iPhone X by nunez on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @06:45PM (#15233681)
I'm glad you enjoyed it but I should have you know that Apple is using a Samsung display and Samsung has been leading the pack in OLED display technology for at least the last 5 years. In fact, the S8 has a crisper screen than the X with its Super Retina display (570 ppi vs 471 ppi)
Re:iPhone X by jskopek on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @07:28PM (#15233991)
To quote the person you just replied to:

"I already know the friend who will come to me tomorrow that his HTC has and 8 core processor while Apple has only six. The point is: it is all useless without the whole package being perfect."

Re:iPhone X by voltagex_ on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @09:47PM (#15234826)
I'm an Android user for years now but I still find it embarrassing that it takes 8 cores to make an Android phone run smoothly.
Re:iPhone X by burnte on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @12:40AM (#15235596)
It doesn't. I've been an Android user since the Nexus One. Android ran amazing on that phone, on pretty much every Nexus phone, and on my Pixel. It ran like crap on the LG G2x, a phone so flawed they lost a class action lawsuit about it. It ran mediocre on my Galaxy S2 and S4, but much better once I used Cyanogenmod. It ran beautifully on my Moto X Gen 1.

Android, just like iOS or any other OS, requires non-crap hardware (not amazing, just well designed) and an OEM that doesn't bloat it up with tons of crap. Newer versions of iOS run like crap on older iPhones, because the OS is designed for newer hardware. Android runs beautifully on well designed hardware, even inexpensive hardware like the Moto G. It runs great without bloated skins and shovelware that "adds value".

Re:iPhone X by randomsearch on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @03:44AM (#15236288)
Being a long-time iPhone user and recently using Android for work (high-spec Nexus models) I can safely say that Android has a _long_ way to go both in terms of responsiveness and design.

It baffles me that Google are so bad at this.

Re:iPhone X by burnte on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @12:01PM (#15239579)
I hear this from folks, and I must be missing something. My wife has an iphone as do many of my users/clients and so I use it a lot, and own an iPad myself. I really don't see a responsiveness difference. Design is more subjective.
Re:iPhone X by valuearb on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @07:32PM (#15234014)
Samsung has a Truetone display now? Don't think so. Samsung puts great components together in a good package then hobbles them with bad decisions, bloatware and incomplete features.
Re:iPhone X by kasabali on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @09:24PM (#15234709)
> Samsung has a Truetone display now? Don't think so.

Apparently it has, for a long time:

> The Adapt Display Mode provides real-time adaptive processing to dynamically adjust images and videos – for some applications it will vary the White Point, Color Gamut, and Color Saturation based on the image content and the color of the surrounding ambient lighting measured by the Galaxy S5 RGB Ambient Light Sensor (which measures color in addition to brightness).

http://www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_S5_ShootOut_1.htm

Re:iPhone X by valuearb on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @10:14PM (#15234978)
Yea, I meant one that actually works well.
Re:iPhone X by onion2k on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @01:57AM (#15235904)
So the 'true' in Truetone is actually a Scotsman?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

Re:iPhone X by valuearb on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @11:20PM (#15244763)
No one thinks Adapt actually works as well as Truetone.
Re:iPhone X by whipoodle on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @10:22PM (#15235016)
Feeds and speeds, feeds and speeds.