News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Daniel Kahneman “I placed too much faith in underpowered ... by stephengillie on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @02:31PM (#15230079)
> "Outstanding scientific importance" screams no boring replication studies that confirm pre-existing work.

The note in the first bullet also forbids replication studies that confirm pre-existing work.

> (the main results and conclusions must not have been published or submitted elsewhere)

Re:Daniel Kahneman “I placed too much faith in underpowered ... by icelancer on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @02:33PM (#15230093)
It can be interpreted that way, but usually that just means the work cannot be dual submitted for consideration or have appeared as a preprint without explicit permission.