News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What's So Bad About Posix I/O? by geocar on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @04:11AM (#15225626)
I think that's unfair: A lot of people have attempted to solve these problems(), and the Windows Way™ has it's own problems. The real answer is probably between elastic infrastructure and the fact that computers got faster and cheaper, and so -- at least for a while the number of people needing solutions here went down.

https://lwn.net/Articles/219954/

* https://lwn.net/Articles/223899/

* https://lwn.net/Articles/221913/

* https://lwn.net/Articles/316806/

* https://lwn.net/Articles/612038/

* https://lwn.net/Articles/671658/

* http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/~vass/linux-aio.txt

* http://ogris.de/howtos/splice.html

And so on.

However a few companies have seen real commercial benefit from actually analysing their data, so we're seeing a lot of "big data" interest. Some of these companies have noticed that a bunch of hadoop/mongo/whatever boxes can't even approach the performance of one "big" box tuned right, so we're seeing somewhat of a resurgence in interest here.

Re:What's So Bad About Posix I/O? by int_19h on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @05:28AM (#15225928)
> and the Windows Way™ has it's own problems

Could you expand on that?

(I'm assuming that by the "Windows Way", you mean I/O completion ports.)