News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Photographer wins 'monkey selfie' legal fight by pavlov on Monday September 11, 2017 @11:52PM (#15224692)
If the camera was in a continuous shooting mode, I take it you're suggesting that the initial frames were authored by the photographer, and at some point the authorship changed after the monkeys had moved the camera enough? And the final frames in the sequence again became authored by the photographer when he grabbed the camera back?

What if it had been wind moving the camera, rather than monkeys? Do you feel his authorship would have been equally lost in the middle of that sequence of frames?

Re:Photographer wins 'monkey selfie' legal fight by kbutler on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @01:09PM (#15229116)
Slater didn't assert that.

""" They were quite mischievous jumping all over my equipment, and it looked like they were already posing for the camera when one hit the button,” he told The Telegraph in 2011. “The sound got his attention and he kept pressing it. He must have taken hundreds of pictures by the time I got my camera back, but not very many were in focus. He obviously hadn’t worked that out yet." """

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/8615...

There is some doubt whether Slater actually used a remote trigger, but that wouldn't have been as good a story as the "monkey selfie", so the image may not have gone viral, though he'd have a better case to own the copyright.