Re:Baffling ABC maths proof now has impenetrable 300-page ‘s...
by Declanomous on Sunday September 10, 2017 @02:33PM
(#15213534)
Not a dig at you, but I tend to use $5 words when a normal word would suffice. Even though the obscure words usually express my thoughts more precisely than common words do, they do a worse job of conveying understanding, since people often do not know the word and infer an incorrect meaning from context.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Baffling ABC maths proof now has impenetrable 300-page ‘s...
by KGIII on Sunday September 10, 2017 @02:40PM
(#15213563)
I try to communicate at a level where the intended audience can easily understand me. This is also partially out of laziness. I don't like having to repeat myself.
Re:Baffling ABC maths proof now has impenetrable 300-page ‘s...
by ohyes on Sunday September 10, 2017 @04:29PM
(#15214177)
I'm not sure if this comment thread is a parody of itself.
Re:Baffling ABC maths proof now has impenetrable 300-page ‘s...
by Declanomous on Monday September 11, 2017 @10:54AM
(#15218939)
That was at least part of my intent.