Re:Why Sub-Prime Lenders Didn’t Cause the Housing Crash (2015)
by exit on Sunday September 10, 2017 @02:05PM
(#15213405)
what makes the whole article junk?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why Sub-Prime Lenders Didn’t Cause the Housing Crash (2015)
by ChuckMcM on Sunday September 10, 2017 @02:35PM
(#15213543)
It ignores the whole cycle of leveraging and recycling that occured when weaponizing mortgage and asset backed securities into CDOs and insurance risk swaps. Sub-prime mortgages were the gasoline on that fire, they took what was perhaps a cabin burning in the woods and turned it into a 10,000 acre wildfire. With out sub-prime mortgages as an accelerator the who CDO mess burns out slowly and in when it starts burning the market moves away in a controlled manner.
To discount or even disconnect the sub-prime lenders from that fire is disingenuous at best in my opinion.
Re:Why Sub-Prime Lenders Didn’t Cause the Housing Crash (2015)
by klenwell on Sunday September 10, 2017 @03:50PM
(#15213977)
Put another way: if you've seen the movie The Big Short, it's like they cut out all the Florida scenes.
If you haven't seen The Big Short, it's still on Netflix.
Re:Why Sub-Prime Lenders Didn’t Cause the Housing Crash (2015)
by thinkcontext on Sunday September 10, 2017 @04:48PM
(#15214254)
Not the Florida scenes, they say subprime grew but it was still small compared to prime. The layering and diving and combining is the Jenga scene.