Re:The early history of HP calculators
by tremendo on Sunday September 10, 2017 @11:43AM
(#15212683)
LOL why bother with a calculator? 16 ÷ 8 easy! I always think of RPN as somewhat akin to using VIM (editor), once you learn it, it becomes unconscious, automatic. I for one don't see how the RPN form relies "on a more extensive cook".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The early history of HP calculators
by carussell on Sunday September 10, 2017 @12:55PM
(#15213038)
Looks like you skipped over this part of my comment in your attempt to be condescending:
> At least, it's how I would have entered it if the figures weren't so small.
Re:The early history of HP calculators
by tremendo on Sunday September 10, 2017 @03:18PM
(#15213800)
I have to apologize. What actually came to mind was that I know some probably couldn't make the mental leap to again divide by the other factor when they see the multiplication symbol there as written, then reaching for the calculator. I totally see now how it appears I was attempting to be condescending, sorry.