Re:Dear Amazon, We Picked Your New Headquarters for You
by ActsJuvenile on Sunday September 10, 2017 @02:06AM
(#15210946)
NYT team seems to have misinterpreted Amazon's "Stable business climate for growth" requirement.
I interpret that more as a political requirement, where city and state governments are strongly pro-business (anti-union?).
Re:Dear Amazon, We Picked Your New Headquarters for You
by BooneJS on Sunday September 10, 2017 @11:18AM
(#15212544)
The current political climate sees a bimodal distribution:
* assume the absolute worst in corporations at all times, even if workers benefit
* assume that corporations will always do what's right, even if it hurts workers
Re:Dear Amazon, We Picked Your New Headquarters for You
by lukeschlather on Sunday September 10, 2017 @09:57AM
(#15212227)
Amazon is hiring at a pretty good clip, to the point that they really do have trouble finding enough qualified applicants to fill their interviews.
Amazon would rather pay a higher salary for someone with experience than train someone.
Re:Dear Amazon, We Picked Your New Headquarters for You
by sevenfive on Sunday September 10, 2017 @06:19AM
(#15211584)
Yeah, I balked when they made the first cut with such a criterion, that doesn't make sense and probably isn't what Amazon intended.
Re:Dear Amazon, We Picked Your New Headquarters for You
by delinka on Saturday September 09, 2017 @10:57PM
(#15210328)
“More competition for employees” translates into higher costs.
Why would Amazon want that rule? Wouldn't it just mean there's more competition for employees? It strikes me as the type of rule put in to ensure their secret favorite gets chosen.