No. In SNOBOL4 (one of the first dynamic typing languages) -- ident(x) yields true if x is "null", eq(x) is true if x is 0, gt(x) is ">" and ge(x) is ">=". The program "code" is a repl.

Notice -- free format dynamic typing, and, it gets it "right". This language/run-time was originally from the late '60s, last official update in 1975 (with some updates in the intervening decades).

Yes, according to the Javascript spec, the JS behaviour is correct. However, something as old as SNOBOL4 should have taught us that keeping type converting numerical operators dis-similar from object comparision would be good: "==" and "===" vs ident() and eq() and then relating ge() le() etc to the numeric class of operations consistently.

  : fred@dejah wittgenstein $; code
  The Macro Implementation of SNOBOL4 in C (CSNOBOL4BX)   Version 2.0
      by Philip L. Budne, January 1, 2015
  SNOBOL4 (Version 3.11, May 19, 1975)
  BLOCKS (Version 1.10, April 1, 1973)
    Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated
  EXTENSIONS (Version 0.25, June 16, 2015)
    Fred Weigel

  No errors detected in source program

  CODE (TUE AUG  4 10:28:58 EDT 2015)
  RUNNING ON CSNOBOL4 MAINBOL WITH SPITBOL, BLOCKS, EXTENSIONS
  ENTER SNOBOL4 STATEMENTS (TRY ? FOR HELP)
  5,541,616 BYTES FREE
  CODE: ident()
  SUCCESS
  CODE: ident(0)
  FAILURE
  CODE: eq(0)
  SUCCESS
  CODE: eq()
  SUCCESS
  CODE: gt()
  FAILURE
  CODE: ge()
  SUCCESS
  CODE:quit
  Normal termination at level 1
  code.lss:660: Last statement executed was 938
  SNOBOL4 statistics summary-
          5.384 ms. Compilation time
         90.585 ms. Execution time
          20577 Statements executed, 121 failed
          20004 Arithmetic operations performed
            122 Pattern matches performed
              2 Regenerations of dynamic storage
         29.481 ms. Execution time in GC
              0 Reads performed
             10 Writes performed
       4402.237 ns. Average per statement executed
        227.157 Thousand statements per second
  : fred@dejah wittgenstein $; 

and, keeping in the spirit:

  CODE: ge('a')
  EXECUTION ERROR #1, Illegal data type
  FAILURE

Allow the explicit capture of "type" errors. We knew this in 1975. Why was this forgotten?