Re:Amazon to Build Second HQ in North America
by unethical_ban on Thursday September 07, 2017 @01:39PM
(#15194060)
I'm not arguing for a ban, but here would be the argument: It's clearly unethical, undesirable behavior, but even if a particular municipality didn't like the game, it's tough not to play (much like taking corporate donations for political campaigns). So instead of trying to live the libertarian good life of "Our city is better than that" and losing because someone else has fewer scruples, it is proposed that the practice be banned.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon to Build Second HQ in North America
by euyyn on Thursday September 07, 2017 @02:18PM
(#15194414)
I guess I would disagree with the "it's clearly unethical, undesirable behavior" part. I just don't think it's clearly good nor clearly bad.
Re:Amazon to Build Second HQ in North America
by unethical_ban on Thursday September 07, 2017 @02:36PM
(#15194586)
I think it isn't in theory (jobs! tax revenue from families!) but how often do these things play out?