Re:Amazon to Build Second HQ in North America
by SaintGhurka on Thursday September 07, 2017 @11:03AM
(#15192473)
I wonder if SLC would be disqualified because it would harm rather than help Amazon's diversity efforts.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon to Build Second HQ in North America
by devmunchies on Thursday September 07, 2017 @11:29AM
(#15192740)
Not building an HQ somewhere because of race sounds like racism to me. This is the problem with considering race at all for hiring decisions. Race != diversity.
If their diversity efforts are for the sake of new thinking, it would benefit their diversity efforts. If their diversity efforts stop at skin color, then yeah, you are right.
Re:Amazon to Build Second HQ in North America
by nkassis on Thursday September 07, 2017 @12:22PM
(#15193250)
I think it's fine to consider attractiveness to a diverse workforce. It's not racism to pick a city that is more diverse than another. It just says we want to make it attractive to the most different type of people possible. It's not just race, other factors make SLC possibly less attractive to minority groups beyond race. And to be fair I don't know how true those concerns are for SLC just making a general point that considering diversity and location isn't a problem