News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IPv10 by leni536 on Thursday September 07, 2017 @08:46AM (#15191308)
Well, the idea is obviously flawed, but I don't think the author meant geostationary orbits.
Re:IPv10 by MertsA on Thursday September 07, 2017 @06:21PM (#15196332)
Then it's much more flawed if it's for anything but geostationary orbits. The way it's written it sounds like he doesn't understand that geostationary satellites have to be high up in the equatorial plane as he mentions each satellite having a specific area.