News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook says it sold political ads to Russian company du... by 13years on Wednesday September 06, 2017 @07:02PM (#15187843)
If we are to accept the 'Clinton Foundation spokesman' as the definitive source of truth, then in fairness we would have to accept the administration's claims on Russia with the same merits.

As to why, there seems to be more of a corrupt veil that obscures Saudi Arabia's true role in the world vs. Russia. For example

https://news.vice.com/story/saudi-arabia-is-the-top-sponsor-...

Re:Facebook says it sold political ads to Russian company du... by lern_too_spel on Wednesday September 06, 2017 @07:22PM (#15187938)
The Clinton Foundation publicly discloses all its donors. https://www.clintonfoundation.org/contributors
Re:Facebook says it sold political ads to Russian company du... by 13years on Wednesday September 06, 2017 @10:20PM (#15188692)
Trump has stated there are no ties to Russia.

So we can now be done with both of these concerns?

Re:Facebook says it sold political ads to Russian company du... by lern_too_spel on Thursday September 07, 2017 @01:01AM (#15189243)
We have already found multiple ties to Russia, contradicting Trump's claims.

The Clinton Foundation's disclosures match the totals in its mandatory financial reports. https://www.clintonfoundation.org/about/annual-financial-rep...

Re:Facebook says it sold political ads to Russian company du... by scottmf on Wednesday September 06, 2017 @07:11PM (#15187884)
>If we are to accept the 'Clinton Foundation spokesman' as the definitive source of truth, then in fairness we would have to accept the administration's claims on Russia with the same merits.

This is some bizarre logic.

Re:Facebook says it sold political ads to Russian company du... by 13years on Wednesday September 06, 2017 @10:18PM (#15188682)
Is it really bizarre to apply the same standards? Can the accused verify themselves innocent in one instance but not in another?