News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lisp Machine Manual (1984) by shawn on Wednesday September 06, 2017 @04:15PM (#15186766)
For example, lisp has no built-in infix syntax

I wrote one: https://github.com/shawwn/lumen/blob/6aa017cfd90fba381b6ea1d...

https://github.com/shawwn/lumen/blob/6aa017cfd90fba381b6ea1d...

It's an experimental feature, but it seems to work fine with no ambiguities. It also has "x = 42" for implicit local variables, rather than "(let x 42 ...)"

What do you think of it? Is it much more readable? I'm still debating whether to keep it.

There are no comments on this comment yet.